编辑“確認偏誤”

{{多個問題|
{{refimprove|time=2020-04-09T19:05:27+00:00}}
{{Expand English|fa=yes|date=2018-05-31T03:19:25+00:00}}
}}
[[File:Handgun collection.JPG|thumb|right|[[槍支管制|槍械擁有問題]]等觀點二極的議題可以看出人對新證據的偏見詮釋。]]
'''確認偏誤'''（或稱'''確認偏差'''、'''證實偏差'''、'''肯證偏誤'''、'''驗證偏誤'''、'''驗證性偏見'''、'''我方偏见'''，{{lang-en|Confirmation bias}}）<ref name="nickerson">{{harvnb|Nickerson|1998|pp=175–220}}</ref>是個人選擇性地回憶、蒐集有利細節，忽略不利或矛盾的[[資訊]]，來支持自己已有的想法或假设的趋势<ref name="plous233">{{Harvnb|Plous|1993|p=233}}</ref><ref name="郑丽玉2006">{{cite book|author=郑丽玉|title=心理學|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=A2vEbulofVAC&pg=PA283|accessdate=2013-01-17|year=2006|publisher=五南圖書出版股份有限公司|isbn=978-957-11-4381-1|pages=283–}}</ref><ref>{{Citation| last=Plous | first=Scott | title=The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making | page=233 | date=1993}}</ref>，属其中一类[[認知偏誤]]和[[归纳推理]]中的一个系统性错误。当人们选择性收集或回忆信息时，又或带有[[偏见]]地解读信息时，他们便展现了確認偏誤。

這種偏見尤其顯見於带有强烈[[情绪]]的問題和傳統觀念上。例如，人們面對情傷，大多難以割捨，會在反覆的情緒中來回擺盪掙扎，過程中不斷回顧並對自己給予合理的解釋與交代，直到身心得到平衡安頓為止。

回顧與重新認知的過程會建構一個新的認知事實，它受到個人價值觀、家人或傳統社會的壓力、或宗教信仰等批判或趨避的影響，而傾向採取對自己較為有利的說法或選擇性的認知，以合理化整個事件，進而化解外部壓力並獲得身心上的平衡。例如說主張某宗教團體是邪教的人將該宗教經典中一些荒誕迷信的內容，及該團體一些信徒像是不顧配偶反對攜帶自家小孩參加宗教活動等偏激的行為，給當成該團體是邪教的證據，卻忽略宗教經典的內容或部分信徒偏激的個人行為，與一個團體是否是邪教未必相關；或者相信算命的人聽到命理師講的話之後，就採信命理師的話，並把自己過去發生的事情當中，和命理師講述的相似的部分，給當成算命準確的證據；又例如當談及[[槍枝管制]]問題時，人們常偏好支持自己原立場，觀點，也傾向將模稜兩可的事實做有利於自己的解釋。

偏見的搜索、理解和回憶，常被用來說明[[態度極化]]（即使爭論雙方都依附於相同的根據，爭執仍變得極端）、[[信念固著]]（在反證出現後依然堅信原有看法）、[[首因效應|非理性首因效應]]（即強烈的「先入為主」效應）及[[錯覺相關]]（對二件偶然事件做無根據的連結的傾向）等現象。

== 參見 ==
{{Portal box|心理學}}
{{div col|4}} 
* [[認知偏誤]]
* [[認知偏誤列表]]
* [[觀察者期望效應]]
* [[選擇性接觸理論]]
* [[迴聲室效應]]
* [[特例假設]]
* [[採櫻桃謬誤]]
* [[訴諸可能]]
* [[單方論證]]
* [[訴諸頑固]]
* [[訴諸對立]]
* [[敵對媒體現象]]
{{div col end}}

== 注脚 ==
<div class="references-small">
{{notefoot}}
</div>

== 参考资料 ==
{{reflist|2}}

== 參考文獻 ==
{{refbegin|30em}}
* {{Citation |last=Baron |first=Jonathan |year=2000 |title=Thinking and deciding |edition=3rd |location=New York |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=0-521-65030-5 |oclc=316403966 |ref=harv}}
* {{Citation |author1={{tsl|en|Cordelia Fine|}}|title=A Mind of its Own: how your brain distorts and deceives |publisher=Icon books |location=Cambridge, UK |year=2006 |isbn=1-84046-678-2 |oclc=60668289 |ref=harv}}
* {{Citation |last=Friedrich |first=James |title=Primary error detection and minimization (PEDMIN) strategies in social cognition: a reinterpretation of confirmation bias phenomena |journal=Psychological Review |year=1993 |volume=100 |issue=2 |pages=298–319 |pmid=8483985 |publisher=American Psychological Association |issn=0033-295X |ref=harv | doi=10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.298 }}
* {{Citation |author1={{tsl|en|Ben Goldacre|}} |title=Bad Science |publisher=Fourth Estate |location=London |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-00-724019-7 |oclc=259713114 |ref=harv}}
* {{Citation |doi=10.1007/s12144-010-9087-5 |last=Hergovich |first=Andreas | last2=Schott |first2=Reinhard |last3=Burger |first3=Christoph |year=2010 |title=Biased Evaluation of Abstracts Depending on Topic and Conclusion: Further Evidence of a Confirmation Bias Within Scientific Psychology |journal=Current Psychology |volume=29 |pages=188–209 |ref=harv |issue=3 }}
* {{Citation |doi=10.1001/jama.263.10.1438 |last=Horrobin |first=David F. |year=1990 |title=The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation |journal=Journal of the American Medical Association |pmid=2304222 |volume=263 |issue=10 |pages=1438–41 |ref=harv }}
* {{Citation |last=Kida |first=Thomas E.|year=2006 |title=Don't believe everything you think: the 6 basic mistakes we make in thinking |location=Amherst, New York |publisher=Prometheus Books|isbn=978-1-59102-408-8 |oclc=63297791 |ref=harv}}
* {{Citation |doi=10.1006/obhd.1993.1044 |last=Koehler |first=Jonathan J. |year=1993 |title=The influence of prior beliefs on scientific judgments of evidence quality |journal=Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes |volume=56 |pages=28–55 |ref=harv}}
* {{Citation |author1={{tsl|en|Ziva Kunda|}}|title=Social Cognition: Making Sense of People |publisher=MIT Press |year=1999 |isbn=978-0-262-61143-5 |oclc=40618974 |ref=harv}}
* {{Citation |last=Lewicka |first=Maria |editor1-first=Mirosław |editor1-last=Kofta |editor2-first=Gifford |editor2-last=Weary |editor3-first= Grzegorz |editor3-last=Sedek |title=Personal control in action: cognitive and motivational mechanisms |publisher=Springer |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-306-45720-3 |oclc=39002877 |chapter=Confirmation Bias: Cognitive Error or Adaptive Strategy of Action Control? |pages=233–55 |ref= harv}}
* {{Citation |doi=10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.259 |last=MacCoun |first=Robert J. |year=1998 |title=Biases in the interpretation and use of research results |journal=Annual Review of Psychology |pmid=15012470 |volume=49 |pages=259–87 |url=http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~maccoun/MacCoun_AnnualReview98.pdf |ref=harv |accessdate=2011-02-03 |archive-date=2011-06-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110622033304/http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~maccoun/MacCoun_AnnualReview98.pdf |dead-url=yes }}
* {{Citation |doi=10.1007/BF01173636 |last=Mahoney |first=Michael J. |year=1977 |title=Publication prejudices: an experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system |journal=Cognitive Therapy and Research |volume=1 |pages=161–75 |ref=harv |issue=2}}
* {{Citation |author1={{tsl|en|Raymond S. Nickerson|}} |year=1998 |title=Confirmation Bias; A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises |journal=Review of General Psychology |publisher=Educational Publishing Foundation |volume=2 |issue=2 |pages=175–220 |issn=1089-2680 |doi=10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175}}
* {{Citation |last=Oswald |first=Margit E. |first2=Stefan |last2=Grosjean |title=Cognitive Illusions: A Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgement and Memory |editor-first=Rüdiger F. |editor-last= Pohl |publisher=Psychology Press |location=Hove, UK |year=2004 |chapter=Confirmation Bias |isbn=978-1-84169-351-4 |oclc=55124398 |pages=79–96 |ref=harv}}
* {{Citation |author1={{tsl|en|Scott Plous|}} |title=The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making |publisher=McGraw-Hill |year=1993 |isbn=978-0-07-050477-6 |oclc=26931106 |ref=harv}}
* {{Citation |last=Poletiek |first=Fenna |title= Hypothesis-testing behaviour |publisher=Psychology Press |location=Hove, UK |year=2001 |isbn=978-1-84169-159-6 |oclc=44683470|ref=harv}}
* {{Citation |last=Risen |first=Jane |first2=Thomas |last2= Gilovich |title=Critical Thinking in Psychology |editor1-first=Robert J. |editor1-last=Sternberg |editor2-first=Henry L. |editor2-last=Roediger&nbsp;III |editor3-first=Diane F. |editor3-last=Halpern |publisher= Cambridge University Press |year=2007 |pages=110–30 |chapter=Informal Logical Fallacies |isbn=978-0-521-60834-3 |oclc=69423179|ref=harv}}
* {{Citation |last=Vyse |first=Stuart A. |title=Believing in magic: The psychology of superstition |year=1997 |isbn=0-19-513634-9 |location=New York |publisher=Oxford University Press |oclc=35025826 |ref=harv}}
{{refend}}

== 外部链接 ==
{{Wikiquote}}

{{認知偏誤}}
{{SocialPsychology}}
{{阴谋论}}

[[Category:實驗設計]]
[[Category:归纳谬误]]
[[Category:认知惯性]]
[[Category:心理學概念]]
[[Category:心理学]]
[[Category:無知]]
[[Category:社會心理學]]